The Yes Campaign is over and the pro-Scotland campaign takes over.

Featured image

Let me start this way, I’m one who campaigned for and voted yes in the Scottish referendum for independence.  Just like many, I was shell shocked at the result and just like many, I too looked around to see what we could do about it.

At first there was the “45” and everybody downloaded twibbons to show that we were the proud 45 or at least 44.7%.
Then there was the “Yes Alliance” who promised to put the now broken but undaunted Yes Campaign back together again.

But what of the 55.3% who for a whole number of reasons voted no?  None of those campaigns really made an effective appeal to that percentage of people who after all hold the keys to our independence in the future.

It’s a sobering fact that unless we get some kind of dialogue going with a fair proportion of the no voters then if another referendum is called regarding Scottish independence, we’ll be right back to the same set of circumstances that created the no vote.

I still see people that are angry online.  The language they use to describe no voters is in many cases unjust and uncalled for. Okay, there are a section of the population who would gladly impale themselves on a Union Jack flagpole just to hear “one single purr” but not every no voter is like that.  Many people simply voted no because there was something that didn’t add up in their mind or they feared something and weren’t aware of the real scare stories regarding the consequences of a no vote which we’re seeing now.  In other words the press and broadcast media (especially the BBC) did their job well for the british establishment.

So, what to do?  To move forward with a Yes Campaign when there’s no referendum in the offing seems unproductive and there’s little chance that such a campaign would draw many no voters to its ranks.  I have a deep pride in those who still hold the passion inside that we saw in the run up to the referendum and state “Still Yes” but perhaps the language of “Yes” is getting in the way of any possible dialogue with those that voted no and might be willing in the light of the present narrative coming from Westminster to vote yes if there was another referendum.  Hold up a yes flag or whatever and those people will simply fail to come forward.

How do we connect?  We start off by changing the language we use, that’s how.

That means we need to personally declare that the yes campaign is, for the time being, over, and get behind the next campaign which is to get 59 “pro-Scotland” MP’s returned to Westminster or as many as humanly possible.

Now what is meant by “pro-Scotland MP’s”? The easiest way to explain that is to tell you what the opposite is; “pro-Westminster MP’s”.  A pro-Westminster MP is part of one of the London based parties and is more likely to play UK party politics instead of pushing Scotland’s agenda forward. Scotland’s agenda just gets pushed aside for the sake of getting the party’s leader into Downing Street and keeping them there.

A pro-Scotland MP on the other hand is by definition a part of one of the Scottish political parties.  That of course doesn’t include Scottish Labour who are a London centric party that just sticks the word “Scottish” onto Labour to signify their branch office in Scotland.

Many of you who read this will know me as someone who gives a lot of thought to any project regarding the constitutional status of Scotland.  I spent a great deal of time considering all the various factors at play right now and it is that which prompted me to come up with the idea behind scot2.scot.  I thank those that gave freely of their time, talents and effort to start it up and it is presently in the early stages of growing.

scot2.scot is a social media communications portal with the primary aim of coordinating a tactical vote in each constituency but it could just as easily be used by various Yes groups to disseminate campaign information which given what I’ve now told you would be self defeating, however, I trust the people that I’ve known and campaigned beside to look this squarely in the eye and adopt the new language in order to start the national conversation again.  This time the conversation has to appeal to those who voted no using language that gets them involved by having broad appeal.

That means that we need to acknowledge that some may only want more powers for Scotland and use our talent to help them get that, because in doing so we’ll be talking to them and perhaps open their eyes to the better possibilities of an independent Scotland.  To begin with though, we have to simply offer the possibilities that 59 pro-Scotland MP’s being returned to Westminster would create.  It would force Scotland’s agenda onto the table and help hold to account those that opened their mouths before the referendum and let their bellies rumble.

I know for many this will require some degree of navel searching but I commend this change of language to all in an effort to bring forth what we want in the end; independence with a good healthy majority supporting it.  Put away the yes banners, flags and other stuff and keep it in a safe place for a time in the future when we’ll need it again.

Get behind scot2.scot and work hard to unseat the pro-Westminster MP’s that stand in our way.

It’s not the end of anything, it’s a way point if you like, on the road to our final destination.

I assure every single one of you, we will get there but we need to change a few things.  It’s time for change.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/scot2.scot/

http://www.scot2.scot

Kindest regards,

David Milligan

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “The Yes Campaign is over and the pro-Scotland campaign takes over.

  1. Ironically enough, I’ve been up late watching an old episode of Inspector Morse & it finishes with Morse quoting some lines from T S Eliot.

    “What we call the beginning is often the end.
    And to make an end is to make a beginning.
    The end is where we start from.”

    Seems appropriate!

  2. Well said. There is an overwhelming majority in the country for full Devomax, ‘a modern form of Home Rule’. That must include control over our tax revenues. We should respect those who voted No to Independence, but include them in the push for Home Rule. I can live (reluctantly) with a continuing UK for now provided, and only provided, that we raise all our own taxation including that from our natural resources.

    Why should we, No voters included, continue to subsidize those who have so little respect for us?

  3. Well said David. You put forward a lot of good points. I agree that “No voters” should not be damned for voting that way. It is meant to be a democracy that we live in and everybody should be able to voice their opinion without fear of recrimination. It is unfortunate that the No campaign’s” promises do not appear to be forthcoming and I am sure there are a lot of disappointed “No voters” and “Yes Voters” who are saying “told you” and are not at all surprised by the non deliverance of promises from Westminster. A change of approach is required and I for one will not be happy until Scotland has Independence and the country we deserve…..

  4. Interesting to read a measured piece like this at a time where the cult of personality has reached religious proportions stifling any kind of discussion about a way forward which would embrace at least some of the 55. The referendum was really not getting anywhere until that amazing upsurge of the Yes movement. The SNP has benefitted greatly from this in terms of membership (and to a lesser extent the Greens). What I hear now is the resurgence of entrenched posturing by both these parties which saddens me as it indicates that they have learned very little from the experience. They have missed the mood – that the people of Scotland where looking for something different, away from old style politics, and yes I acknowledge that for some joining the SNP has been their response to the referendum result. For most people, however, and I am thinking of both the 45 and the 55, they have been left feeling out of the process now. It is crucial that we do not allow the political parties to dictate the tone of ‘The Way Forward’ because it is only through engaging with both former yes and no voters that self determination for the people of Scotland will be attained.

  5. It may be better, to get your message across to a much wider audience, that you do more VIDEO rather than the written word. Now let me say, I am not putting down our modern generation, but, I do know having had five children of my own, that when the youth of today sees a lot of text on a screen, it has a tendency to put them off. Your intro video to the scot2.scot website was excellent and got the message across quickly and clearly.

  6. So, David to clarify: are you saying that we should essentially have a YES Alliance but call it the Pro-Scotland Alliance? If we do it would surely need to be tied to a mandate for devo max otherwise why would pro-indy voters vote for it necessarily. Also, are you saying that people like Henry McLeish, who put paty before country should stand for such an Pro-Scotland group? Is this a real broad based alliance of pro-indy candidatres or are we saying they wouldn’t even need to be pro-indy? Is it SNP + or something genuinely broader?

  7. I live in England, having been born here of two Scottish expat parents. I was very disappointed that the referendum delivered the no. I am very supportive, even though I will still live in England, of Scotland becoming independent and am intensely proud of my Scottish heritage.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s